Concentrated Coaching
  • Home
  • Writers' Block
  • Career Shifts
  • Stuck?
    • Entrepreneurs' Block
    • Executive Presence
    • Phobias
  • Client Stories
    • Case: Bringing Leadership into Focus
    • Case: Dissolving Creativity Block
    • Case: Asking for Money
    • Case: Overcoming Freeway Phobia
    • Case: Coaching for Writers' Block
  • Training
    • Workshops
    • Professional Trainings
    • Testimonials
  • FAQs/On Mark
    • What to Expect
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Blog
    • Resources
  • Contact

How “Getting it Right” Can Make You Stupid: The Gifts of Anomaly, Ambiguity, and Many Possibilities

5/30/2018

5 Comments

 
​Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn’t. –Mark Twain
​It bucks the tide of years of education, reinforced by decades of expertise-building. Yet, my trying to “get it right” often erodes the end I have in mind: wise insight supporting empowered action. The more I focus on figuring stuff out—especially when I might have to defend it—the less wise and impactful I am.

How Could that Be?

​Did you read that subtitle as a challenging question, informed by a disbelieving position: “How could thatbe?” [No way!]
 
Or did it come to you from a place of wonder and curiosity: “How could that be?” [Wow! I can’t wait to find out!]
 
It’s not that learning has the aim of dumbing us down. There’s a kind of agenda-free discovery that builds wisdom. 
 
Still, I find that “knowing stuff” often narrows my perspective, perhaps an unintentional result of a system that wants us to learn…but in fact rewards us for being right and embracing what’s widely accepted. Figuring-it-out-based “intelligence” can alienate those who are not already onboard. It defeats my purpose of wanting to “connect and enroll”—a dynamic, instead, of “comply and cajole.” 

The Multiple Possibility Waveform—An Experiment

Picture
​Consider this alternative to zeroing in on the one best answer. In seeking powerful insight, allow multiple possibilities and keep them open. 
 
Try this experiment: a traditional “right answer” lens, and an alternative “multiple possibility waveform” lens. Apply them to a controversy you are experiencing. My example: a potential client wrote wanting to defer work, so she can do other healing first.
 
For the “right answer” lens, rest in the mode we normally inhabit. What’s the right answer? How do I figure it out? Is it this one? Is it that one? What happens if I get it wrong? My example: should I say “Whatever supports you?” “Maybe that’s a signal to DO coaching, vs. delaying it?” Or something else? There is energy in trying to figure out what this client should do, and how to support that outcome.
 
Now: notice what you’re feeling. For me, it’s an easy, comfortable place. My mind gets busy with “figuring it out” energy. (In my example, how does this relate to other clients who’ve deferred?)But there’s also considerable anxiety—since it feels like there’s only one right answer, what happens if I miss it? That anxiety keeps me in my head and defensive. I’m closed to new possibilities. 

Picture
 
My example: the client emailed, so initially I limited thoughts about my own response to email as well. But, would it be better to call? More anxiety as there’s more right/wrong choices! As I start to go down a path to the right answer, I’ve spent so much time trying to justify my selection, I find I’m rather attached to that choice.The “comfort” is that of a prison cell—familiar, yet limiting and cold. 
 
Yeeesh!

Picture
OK, now try the second lens. Here, the power comes not from focusing on the one right answer. Rather, from entertaining multiple good enough answers, and opening up the possibility of more. Here’s a metaphor: if you had a deck of cards, method one is trying to draw the Ace of Spades…method two is holding/seeing many cards at once. 
 
In my example, I realize I’m taking responsibility for a choice that’s not mine. As I relinquish the fear of being wrong, I open to a greater sense of trust in myself and my client, and a relaxed way to communicate, including some pros and cons. A vibration emerges that feels like it’s building relationship, hope, and well-being, whatever the decision. And I feel my heart open, too, as I relax into playful curiosity…maybe even a greater intelligence

Let's Play! Where?

​Areas that attract skepticism have been fertile ground for me--NDEs (near death experiences), for example. Laurin Bellg, MD in Near Death in the ICU: Stories from Patients Near Death and Why We Should Listen to Them, offers a fresh perspective. Many caregivers, intending to be supportive, dismiss these often profoundly meaningful NDE experiences. How could a patient view themselves outside their body, see past loved ones, etc.? Such denial not only erodes the caregiver’s relationship, but also disturbs the patient and hinders recovery. Why invalidate? Why not allow multiple possibilities that include “maybe it didn’t happen…AND maybe it did?”  As she quotes Carl Sagan, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” 
 
Or, consider “traditional” vs. “restorative” justice. Focusing on judging guilt and assigning punishment, the traditional system hasn’t done so well in preventing infractions or reducing recidivism--let alone healing the anguish crime and its punishment create. Restorative justice aims at repair rather than judgment—of the infraction, the circumstances, and healing the wounds to all parties involved. When victims, offenders and community members meet, the results can be transformational. I’m studying it!
 
Where else? Artificial Intelligence researchers are building smarter systems by leaving room for questions—e.g., self-driving algorithms that slow/signal when alternative views arise. 

Extra!

I’m finishing this at a Pachamama Alliance gathering, featuring renowned speakers on sustainability, social justice, and spiritual reconnection. I asked Charles Eisenstein (author of The More Beautiful World Our Hearts Know is Possible) about how he’s built his own attunement. He said: “I don’t really have any especially impressive practices…but I will say that one is asking the question of ‘what is it like to be you?’” He explained how that’s an antidote to our habit of finding the problem and killing it, getting instead at the root conditions and uncomfortably broader perspectives. He called for “embracing the not knowing.” “Let’s admit ‘we don’t know what to do….’ That’s a lot better than thinking we know what to do, doing it, and making things worse.”
 
So, do your own experiments on allowing multiple possibilities and keeping ambiguity open. And share what you discover here!
5 Comments
Jeff Bell link
6/3/2018 09:41:58 pm

This is brilliant and so needed in our world today. Most people are so focused on "the right answer" that they miss the wisdom, creativity and and joy that comes from the time we spend in a state of curiosity. Thanks for taking the time to think about this and to express it so clearly and powerfully.

Reply
Mark Hurwich link
6/4/2018 06:25:01 am

Thanks for taking the time to comment, Jeff! I got a less-than-usual number of clicks and comments on this one, so I was wondering if it was something about the blog (obtuse, not needed, or too obvious) or the challenge in the issue. Hmmm, I think I'll keep the possibility of all of that open.

Reply
Judith link
6/4/2018 07:37:53 am

Congratulations Mark for a great blog!
Everything you say is so true and I am glad your message is allowing us to be more open and to consider new options.
I Love the quote of Carl Sagan!!! “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” I believe in NDE and in so many other things.

Reply
David Papa
10/18/2018 09:12:16 am

Really nice post, Mark. I linked to it from the Leading as Sacred Practice post. This is actually a message quite relevant for me in this moment. There is someone in my life going through pain, and in trying to help her I get sucked into the "I must figure it out" mode. I really see the value in opening to the "waveform" and seeing what possibility emerges. I love the physics metaphor applied to questions. And as I feel into this, it feels like it requires a good deal of presence. Just holding the not knowing and staying there, seeing where the waveform lands. I can feel the pressure building of wanting to know and wanting to help this person. I think that pressure is my own locked pain that this is helping me see and let go of. Very interesting. Thank you!

Reply
Debra link
3/23/2021 04:23:42 am

Great read thank you

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Portrait of Mark Hurwich

    Author

    Mark has over 40 years of experience in strategy, and sales/marketing — from startups to multinationals.

    Archives

    January 2023
    November 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    March 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    July 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    April 2014
    November 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Contact Mark

Pick up the phone: (267) 629-2189
Drop me a line: mark@concentratedcoaching.net
Learn More! Schedule a
Complimentary Discovery Session
Click to Schedule an Appointment
Subscribe ​to get insights and resources from Mark — no spam, no more than six a year.
GET THE NEWSLETTER